Hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies is not a major cause of idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Carpal tunnel syndrome is a debilitating neuropathy affecting millions of individuals. Although there are published reports of familial associations of carpal tunnel syndrome, the molecular mechanisms are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and potential role of the chromosome 17 microdeletion associated with hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies in patients diagnosed as having carpal tunnel syndrome. DESIGN: Prospective study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Since hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies may present as carpal tunnel syndrome, we evaluated 50 patients with idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome for hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies. RESULTS: No hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies deletions were detected. CONCLUSION: Molecular genetic testing for hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies in patients with idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome is of limited value.

Comparison of carpal canal pressure in paraplegic and nonparaplegic subjects: clinical implications.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pressure within the carpal tunnel that was generated with certain tasks in paraplegic versus nonparaplegic subjects. Four groups of subjects were evaluated: 10 wrists in six paraplegic subjects with carpal tunnel syndrome, 11 wrists in six paraplegics without the syndrome, 12 wrists in nine nonparaplegics with the syndrome, and 17 wrists in 11 nonparaplegics without the syndrome. Carpal canal pressures were measured in the wrists in three positions (neutral, 45-degree flexion, 45-degree extension) and during two dynamic tasks [wheelchair propulsion and RAISE (relief of anatomic ischial skin embarrassment) maneuver]. External force resistors were placed over the carpal canal and correlated with internal tunnel pressures. At each wrist position, paraplegics with carpal tunnel syndrome consistently had higher carpal canal pressure than did the other groups at the corresponding wrist position; statistical significance was evident with regard to the neutral wrist position (p < 0.05). Within each group of subjects, wrist extension and wrist flexion produced a statistically significant increase in carpal canal pressure (p < 0.05), compared with the neutral wrist position. Dynamic tasks (wheelchair propulsion and the RAISE maneuver) significantly elevated the carpal canal pressure in paraplegics with carpal tunnel syndrome, compared with the other groups (p < 0.05). Lastly, there is a linear positive correlation between carpal canal pressure and external force resistance.

Physical and psychosocial symptoms among 88 volunteer subjects compared with patients seeking plastic surgery procedures to the breast.

In an investigation of the relationship between macromastia and physical and psychosocial symptoms, 88 female university students, 21 augmentation mammaplasty patients, and 31 breast reduction patients graded somatic and psychosocial symptoms. The intent of the study was to discover which complaints were most common among women presenting for reduction mammaplasty and to determine whether height/weight index and brassiere chest measurement and cup size might affect their symptoms. Both the student group and the augmentation mammaplasty patients differed significantly from the breast reduction patients. Eighty-one percent of the reduction patients complained of neck and back pain. Seventy-seven percent complained of shoulder pain, 58 percent complained of chafing or rash; 45 percent reported significant limitation in their activity; and 52 percent were unhappy with their appearance (p < 0.001 compared with augmentation and student groups). Physical symptoms were related to height/weight index and bra chest and cup sizes in each of the three participating groups. It was found that patients who present for symptom-related reduction mammaplasty have a disease-specific group of physical and psychosocial complaints that are more directly related to large breast size than to being overweight.

Quality of life and disease-specific functional status following microvascular reconstruction for advanced (T3 and T4) oropharyngeal cancers.

In an effort to evaluate quality-of-life benefits of ablative head and neck cancer surgery and microvascular reconstruction, a longitudinal study was undertaken in which patients with T3 or T4 oropharyngeal cancers without systemic metastases at presentation were administered both general and disease-specific quality-of-life instruments preoperatively and postoperatively. In an initial prospective pilot study, 17 cancer patients were evaluated both preoperatively and postoperatively using the Medical Outcomes Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36) and the Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer Patients. In the second part of the study, the need was recognized for a different disease-specific measure, for more frequent intervals of longitudinal follow-up (rather than be limited by a single data collection point), and for a noncancer control group. Since then, 17 more cancer patients were evaluated in the second part of the study and were compared with patients who had similar reconstructions after suffering head and neck trauma and also with age-matched controls. Instead of the performance status scale, the University of Washington Head and Neck Quality of Life questionnaire was substituted. Interval assessments were done at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and preoperatively. Whereas many of the general and disease-specific quality of life subclasses initially worsened following extensive surgery and radiation therapy, most returned to the preoperative baseline by 6 months following conclusion of treatment and surpassed pretreatment values at 1 year. It can be concluded, based on this study, that large resections and reconstructions for head and neck cancer patients are justified in terms of outcome; the resection controls the local disease, and the microvascular reconstruction restores quality of life and functional status.

Sensory recovery of innervated and non-innervated radial forearm free flaps: functional implications.

Findings reported in the literature on the sensation provided by intraorally applied innervated vs. non-innervated radial forearm free flaps differ. In an effort to understand these differences in sensory recovery, the authors carried out sensory evaluations in 12 patients who had undergone radial forearm free flaps. Seven patients had innervated flaps for defects of the tongue and floor of mouth; five had non-innervated flaps to various sites. Flap sensitivity to temperature, light touch, dull touch, and sharpness and two-point discrimination was assessed at the donor site and contralaterally, and at the recipient site and contralateral mirror-image oral mucosa. Patients subjectively rated post-reconstruction sensation and provided quality of life (QOOL) data. The innervated flaps demonstrated better sensory recovery than the non-innervated flaps, although the latter did restore reasonable sensation. This paper describes the results, compares the study to other similar studies, and discusses various factors in the sensory recovery of both innervated and non-innervated intraoral radial forearm free flaps. The authors conclude that, although the trend in this study is toward improved function with the innervated flaps, these flaps do not appear to offer major intraoral functional advantage over the non-innervated flaps, which attain reasonably effective sensory recovery from neural ingrowth, if the lingual nerve is intact.

Reconstruction of fingertip amputations with full-thickness perionychial grafts from the retained part and local flaps.

The treatment of fingertip amputations distal to the distal interphalangeal joint when the amputated part is saved is difficult and controversial. Both reattachment of the amputated portion as a composite graft and microvascular anastomosis are prone to failure in this distal location. The authors have evolved a reconstructive plan that uses the nail matrix, perionychium, and hyponychium of the amputated fingertip as a full-thickness graft when the amputation is between the midportion of the nail bed andjust proximal to the eponychial fold. Various flaps are used to lengthen and augment the finger pulp, and skeletal pinning is carried out as necessary. The charts of 15 patients who underwent this procedure over a 38 month period were evaluated retrospectively. Seven returned to the office for examination at least 1 year after the fingertip reconstruction described above; four others were interviewed by telephone. Nail deformity, fingertip sensation, and joint range of motion were evaluated, and the reconstructed fingertips were photographed in standardized views. In six of the seven patients seen in the office, aesthetic and functional results were judged as good by both patient and physician; one of the six had minimal nail curvature. The seventh patient had no nail growth, although finger length was retained and there was no functional disability. The four patients interviewed by phone reported normal fingertip use with no dysesthesias or cold intolerance; all had nail growth, although three patients described slight nail curvature that required care in trimming. The authors favor salvage of all perionychial parts when a distal fingertip amputation occurs. Reconstruction of the fingertip with grafting of the hyponychium, perionychium, and nail matrix from the amputated part combined with local flaps can provide a very satisfactory functional and aesthetic result.